Advertisement
LANV vs SSOK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANV is a Hold and SSOK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LANV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSSOK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LANV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SSOK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LANV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSOK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LANV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SSOK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
LANV (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +3.82% price change this week, while SSOK (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.58%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+3.39% weekly)The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.
| LANV | SSOK | LANV / SSOK | |
| Capitalization | 284M | 73.3K | 387,449% |
| EBITDA | -68.68M | 746K | -9,207% |
| Gain YTD | 12.090 | -90.310 | -13% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 0.08 | - |
| Revenue | 383M | 9.18M | 4,171% |
| Total Cash | 18.3M | 15.8K | 115,823% |
| Total Debt | 283M | 174K | 162,644% |
SSOK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LANV | SSOK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 71% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
LANV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LANV and BGI have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LANV and BGI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LANV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LANV | 100% | -3.30% | ||
| BGI - LANV | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| LVMUY - LANV | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
| WOSGF - LANV | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| HESAY - LANV | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| HESAF - LANV | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.78% | ||
More | ||||
SSOK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SSOK and LANV have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSOK and LANV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SSOK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSOK | 100% | N/A | ||
| LANV - SSOK | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.30% | ||
| BRLT - SSOK | -0% Poorly correlated | +9.35% | ||
| WOSGF - SSOK | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.54% |