Ad is loading...
LAVFX vs RMEBX
LAVFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$14.58
Change-$0.08 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.50
Change-$0.57 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.33B
LAVFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. LAVFX (1.88B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMEBX (1.15) vs LAVFX (0.95). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVFX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.79). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.48 vs. LAVFX (4.00). LAVFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.91 vs. RMEBX (75.71).
| LAVFX | RMEBX | LAVFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.080 | 1.093 | -99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 102B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.15 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | 5.48 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.35 | 15.13 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.91 | 75.71 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.38 | 63.40 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...