Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMEBX
LAVFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$16.64
Change+$0.08 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
LAVFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVFX (2.08B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LAVFX (0.88). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX (4.81) and LAVFX (4.66) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX (55.95) and LAVFX (55.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVFX | RMEBX | LAVFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.281 | 13.527 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.05 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 4.81 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.76 | 38.19 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.66 | 55.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.74 | 89.36 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement