Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMEBX
LAVFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$16.04
Change-$0.10 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
LAVFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAVFX (2.04B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMEBX (1.11) vs LAVFX (0.93). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX (7.63) and LAVFX (7.61) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX (53.85) and LAVFX (53.06) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVFX | RMEBX | LAVFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.907 | 10.612 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.11 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 7.63 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.77 | 22.19 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.06 | 53.85 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.87 | 77.43 | 39% |