Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMEBX
LAVPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.62
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.45
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
LAVPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVPX (2.1B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LAVPX (0.57). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.78 vs. LAVPX (7.21). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.31 vs. LAVPX (57.93).
| LAVPX | RMEBX | LAVPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.029 | 14.628 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.05 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | 7.78 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.21 | 37.96 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.93 | 62.31 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.79 | 95.56 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement