Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMEBX
LAVPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$15.83
Change-$0.09 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
LAVPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAVPX (2.03B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMEBX (1.11) vs LAVPX (0.60). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. LAVPX (6.54). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. LAVPX (50.18).
| LAVPX | RMEBX | LAVPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.981 | 10.612 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.11 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 7.63 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.87 | 22.19 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | 53.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.91 | 77.43 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement