Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$14.67
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.01
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LAVPX (1.9B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.37) vs LAVPX (0.66). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.22 vs. LAVPX (2.57). RMFCX (59.17) and LAVPX (56.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.341 | 2.924 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.37 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 5.22 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.15 | 18.48 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.74 | 59.17 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.02 | 61.78 | 24% |