Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$15.85
Change+$0.15 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVPX (2.04B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.27) vs LAVPX (0.62). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. LAVPX (8.56). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.49 vs. LAVPX (56.48).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.117 | 11.347 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.27 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.56 | 11.38 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.35 | 30.87 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.48 | 60.49 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.45 | 81.82 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement