Ad is loading...
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$14.08
Change+$0.17 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.74
Change+$0.73 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. LAVPX (1.79B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LAVPX (0.64). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVPX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. LAVPX (-1.09). LAVPX (54.34) and RMFCX (54.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.116 | -1.247 | 410% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 97.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.34 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.09 | 3.87 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.04 | 9.64 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.34 | 54.30 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.14 | 55.97 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...