Ad is loading...
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$14.81
Change+$0.13 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.95
Change+$0.18 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.3B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. LAVPX (1.89B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LAVPX (0.64). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVPX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.53 vs. LAVPX (2.21). LAVPX return over 5 years is better than : 83.64 vs. RMFCX (76.10).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.136 | 2.814 | 5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.89B | 102B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.34 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | 6.53 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.66 | 11.52 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.64 | 76.10 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.73 | 65.70 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...