Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.46
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAVPX (2.07B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.21) vs LAVPX (0.57). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LAVPX (3.63). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. LAVPX (47.10).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.551 | 12.783 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.21 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | 6.00 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.82 | 27.94 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.10 | 52.67 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.54 | 84.73 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement