Ad is loading...
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$15.31
Change+$0.09 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LAVPX (1.99B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LAVPX (0.57). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVPX (26.00) and RMFCX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.23 vs. RMFCX (12.43). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. LAVPX (31.77).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.434 | 2.162 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.69 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.23 | 12.43 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.17 | 12.60 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.77 | 37.82 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.06 | 65.18 | 38% |