Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$14.88
Change-$0.14 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LAVPX (1.92B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LAVPX (0.64). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. LAVPX (4.47). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. LAVPX (51.89).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.501 | 6.021 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 106B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 8.70 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.39 | 28.43 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.89 | 59.85 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.43 | 69.75 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement