Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.57
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVPX (2.1B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAVPX (0.57). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. RMFCX (7.44). LAVPX (62.02) and RMFCX (60.80) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.029 | 14.964 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | 7.44 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.45 | 43.84 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.02 | 60.80 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.99 | 94.21 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement