Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$15.83
Change-$0.09 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.07
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAVPX (2.03B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.26) vs LAVPX (0.60). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. LAVPX (6.54). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.95 vs. LAVPX (50.18).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.981 | 10.721 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.26 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 7.77 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.87 | 22.69 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | 54.95 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.91 | 79.02 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement