Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAVPX (2.22B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LAVPX (0.30). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAVPX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVPX (9.30) and RMFCX (9.14) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. LAVPX (26.30).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.016 | 10.454 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.15 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.30 | 9.14 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.86 | 38.82 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.30 | 36.70 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.01 | 92.27 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers