Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. LAVPX (2.15B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.19) vs LAVPX (0.31). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAVPX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVPX (10.44) and RMFCX (10.10) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. LAVPX (20.68).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.279 | 5.845 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 115B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.19 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | 10.10 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.28 | 34.65 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.68 | 33.85 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.35 | 91.46 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers