Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMEBX
LAVRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMEBX
LAVRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAVRX (2.18B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMEBX (1.04) vs LAVRX (0.27). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVRX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LAVRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.16 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. LAVRX (25.57).
| LAVRX | RMEBX | LAVRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.223 | 6.308 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.04 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.16 | 9.11 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.59 | 34.37 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.57 | 34.74 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.09 | 94.33 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement