Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFCX
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$15.60
Change+$0.10 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAVRX (2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFCX (1.27) vs LAVRX (0.58). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. LAVRX (8.73). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. LAVRX (58.38).
| LAVRX | RMFCX | LAVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.267 | 9.596 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.27 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 11.47 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.55 | 29.27 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.38 | 61.83 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.80 | 79.21 | 30% |