Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFCX
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$15.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.11
Change-$0.30 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVRX (2.04B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFCX (1.27) vs LAVRX (0.58). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. LAVRX (6.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.85 vs. LAVRX (54.45).
| LAVRX | RMFCX | LAVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.174 | 11.347 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.27 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 10.03 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.74 | 27.58 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.45 | 58.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.36 | 80.13 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement