Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFCX
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$16.20
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAVRX (2.07B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LAVRX (0.55). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.55 vs. RMFCX (7.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. LAVRX (53.32).
| LAVRX | RMFCX | LAVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.354 | 11.421 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.24 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.55 | 7.71 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.09 | 32.16 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.32 | 56.41 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.43 | 91.12 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement