Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFCX
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$14.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAVRX (1.92B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LAVRX (0.60). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. LAVRX (4.64). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.95 vs. LAVRX (41.73).
| LAVRX | RMFCX | LAVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.635 | 5.423 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.31 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.64 | 8.44 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.53 | 18.47 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.73 | 50.95 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.69 | 69.73 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement