Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFCX
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$16.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LAVRX (2.11B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAVRX (0.54). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVRX (8.32) and RMFCX (8.11) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. LAVRX (56.03).
| LAVRX | RMFCX | LAVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.351 | 14.779 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.20 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.32 | 8.11 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.59 | 43.61 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.03 | 59.28 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.84 | 93.90 | 40% |