Ad is loading...
LAVRX vs RMFCX
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$13.93
Change+$0.18 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.01
Change+$0.55 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.25B
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.2B vs. LAVRX (1.77B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LAVRX (0.60). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVRX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. LAVRX (-2.61). LAVRX (52.34) and RMFCX (50.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVRX | RMFCX | LAVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.335 | -3.599 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 96.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.34 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.61 | 1.37 | -190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.42 | 7.19 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.34 | 50.63 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.74 | 51.64 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...