Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFCX
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFCX
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAVRX (2.22B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LAVRX (0.26). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVRX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAVRX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVRX (9.24) and RMFCX (9.14) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. LAVRX (26.02).
| LAVRX | RMFCX | LAVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.936 | 10.454 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.15 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.24 | 9.14 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | 38.82 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.02 | 36.70 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.44 | 92.27 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers