Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMEBX
LAVVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$16.56
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
LAVVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAVVX (2.02B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMEBX (1.11) vs LAVVX (0.99). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAVVX (9.52) and RMEBX (9.12) have marching annual gain over last year. LAVVX (53.23) and RMEBX (51.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVVX | RMEBX | LAVVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.008 | 9.513 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.11 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.52 | 9.12 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.96 | 21.70 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.23 | 51.78 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.62 | 76.00 | 43% |