Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMFCX
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$17.32
Change+$0.12 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVVX (2.09B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LAVVX (0.97). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.33 vs. RMFCX (7.56). LAVVX (62.50) and RMFCX (60.44) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVVX | RMFCX | LAVVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.979 | 13.116 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.24 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 7.56 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.80 | 33.69 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.50 | 60.44 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.64 | 96.24 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement