Ad is loading...
LAVVX vs RMFCX
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$14.51
Change+$0.25 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LAVVX (1.74B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LAVVX (1.05). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. LAVVX (-3.53). RMFCX (53.32) and LAVVX (51.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVVX | RMFCX | LAVVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.161 | -2.681 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 95.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.34 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.53 | 1.87 | -188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.73 | 6.27 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.63 | 53.32 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.78 | - |