Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMFCX
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$17.00
Change-$0.31 (-1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.65
Change-$1.23 (-1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.72B
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAVVX (2.05B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAVVX (0.94). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.20 vs. RMFCX (4.90). LAVVX return over 5 years is better than : 58.32 vs. RMFCX (54.90).
| LAVVX | RMFCX | LAVVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.695 | 12.099 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 4.90 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.16 | 41.16 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.32 | 54.90 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.20 | 90.73 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement