Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMFCX
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$17.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAVVX (2.07B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFCX (1.21) vs LAVVX (0.94). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LAVVX (4.37). RMFCX (52.67) and LAVVX (51.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVVX | RMFCX | LAVVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.086 | 12.783 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.21 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.37 | 6.00 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.85 | 27.94 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.12 | 52.67 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.93 | 84.73 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers