Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMFCX
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$16.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.41
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.92B
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAVVX (2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFCX (1.27) vs LAVVX (1.01). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. LAVVX (5.74). LAVVX (57.25) and RMFCX (57.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVVX | RMFCX | LAVVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.185 | 9.578 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.74 | 8.23 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.59 | 31.78 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.25 | 57.17 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.59 | 76.07 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers