Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMFCX
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$16.56
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.47
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAVVX (2.02B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFCX (1.26) vs LAVVX (0.99). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVVX (9.52) and RMFCX (9.26) have marching annual gain over last year. LAVVX (53.23) and RMFCX (52.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVVX | RMFCX | LAVVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.008 | 9.615 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.52 | 9.26 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.96 | 22.20 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.23 | 52.85 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.62 | 77.57 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement