Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMFCX
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$15.78
Change+$0.15 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAVVX (1.92B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LAVVX (1.04). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. LAVVX (5.53). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. LAVVX (45.40).
| LAVVX | RMFCX | LAVVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.758 | 5.919 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.31 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | 9.01 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.95 | 17.82 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.40 | 51.66 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.47 | - |