Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMFCX
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFCX
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAVVX (2.22B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LAVVX (0.67). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVVX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.21 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. LAVVX (30.58).
| LAVVX | RMFCX | LAVVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.341 | 10.454 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.15 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.21 | 9.14 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.95 | 38.82 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | 36.70 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.99 | 92.27 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers