LAZ
Price
$57.12
Change
-$0.63 (-1.09%)
Updated
Aug 29, 12:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.45B
55 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$115.57
Change
-$0.83 (-0.71%)
Updated
Aug 29, 12:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.89B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAZ vs SF

Header iconLAZ vs SF Comparison
Open Charts LAZ vs SFBanner chart's image
Lazard
Price$57.12
Change-$0.63 (-1.09%)
Volume$600
Capitalization5.45B
Stifel Financial
Price$115.57
Change-$0.83 (-0.71%)
Volume$100
Capitalization11.89B
LAZ vs SF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAZ vs. SF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAZ is a Buy and SF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LAZ: $57.75 vs. SF: $116.40)
Brand notoriety: LAZ and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAZ: 52% vs. SF: 74%
Market capitalization -- LAZ: $5.45B vs. SF: $11.89B
LAZ [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $5.45B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LAZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAZ and SF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than LAZ.

Price Growth

LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +8.49% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.04% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($11.9B) has a higher market cap than LAZ($5.45B). SF has higher P/E ratio than LAZ: SF (22.56) vs LAZ (19.78). LAZ YTD gains are higher at: 15.782 vs. SF (10.747). SF has less debt than LAZ: SF (1.55B) vs LAZ (2.21B). SF has higher revenues than LAZ: SF (5.06B) vs LAZ (3.08B).
LAZSFLAZ / SF
Capitalization5.45B11.9B46%
EBITDA538MN/A-
Gain YTD15.78210.747147%
P/E Ratio19.7822.5688%
Revenue3.08B5.06B61%
Total Cash1.22BN/A-
Total Debt2.21B1.55B142%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAZ vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
LAZ
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7974
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3520
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAZ's Valuation (22) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (33). This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (35). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (100). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (45). This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (100). This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAZSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZECP33.030.12
+0.36%
Zacks Earnings Consistent ETF
JHML76.710.19
+0.25%
JHancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
NCPB25.160.04
+0.18%
Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF
CPSL26.730.04
+0.17%
Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF
MZZ8.29-0.02
-0.26%
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400