Advertisement
LB vs WTTR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LB is a Hold and WTTR is a Buy.
| LB | WTTR | LB / WTTR | |
| Capitalization | 2.47B | 2.66B | 93% |
| EBITDA | 149M | 253M | 59% |
| Gain YTD | 78.090 | 98.829 | 79% |
| P/E Ratio | 77.15 | 73.71 | 105% |
| Revenue | 225M | 1.43B | 16% |
| Total Cash | 39.8M | 33.4M | 119% |
| Total Debt | 536M | 292M | 184% |
WTTR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LB | WTTR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while WTTR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WTTR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LB’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTTR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LB’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
- WTTR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LB (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while WTTR (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +2.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.21%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
LB is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
WTTR is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (+1.87% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+0.17% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CPAI | 52.36 | 0.99 | +1.93% |
| Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF | |||
| WBIG | 26.43 | 0.11 | +0.43% |
| WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | |||
| BTRN | 27.36 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | |||
| GTOS | 24.77 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Invesco Short Duration Total ReturnBdETF | |||
| GTO | 45.50 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
| Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | |||
LB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LB has been loosely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LB jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
WTTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTTR has been loosely correlated with DNOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTTR jumps, then DNOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WTTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTTR | 100% | +1.38% | ||
| DNOW - WTTR | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| BOOM - WTTR | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| NOV - WTTR | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| NPKI - WTTR | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| RNGR - WTTR | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
More | ||||