Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMEBX
LBDRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMEBX
LBDRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBDRX (117M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBDRX (1.35) vs RMEBX (1.00). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBDRX (13 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LBDRX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LBDRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LBDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. RMEBX (8.09). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.06 vs. LBDRX (17.13).
| LBDRX | RMEBX | LBDRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.07 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.07 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.104 | 9.365 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.00 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 8.09 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.31 | 32.10 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.13 | 36.06 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.39 | 89.68 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers