Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RWEBX
LBDRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.24M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.77
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
LBDRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. LBDRX (93.2M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBDRX (1.17) vs RWEBX (0.76). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LBDRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.78 vs. LBDRX (-1.31). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.82 vs. LBDRX (32.56).
| LBDRX | RWEBX | LBDRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.06 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.06 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.050 | 8.175 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.2M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.76 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.31 | 3.78 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.39 | 27.15 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.56 | 40.82 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.83 | 66.81 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement