Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RWEBX
LBDRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RWEBX
LBDRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. LBDRX (117M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBDRX (1.35) vs RWEBX (0.76). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBDRX (13 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). LBDRX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LBDRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). LBDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. RWEBX (5.40). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.80 vs. LBDRX (17.13).
| LBDRX | RWEBX | LBDRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.06 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.06 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.104 | 4.570 | 352% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.76 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 5.40 | 263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.31 | 25.01 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.13 | 24.80 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.39 | 73.09 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement