Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBISX vs RMFCX
LBISX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBISX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value IS
Price$22.51
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.67M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LBISX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBISX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBISX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LBISX (97.7M). LBISX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBISX (1.69) vs RMFCX (1.20). LBISX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBISX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LBISX (0.76). LBISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBISX: RMFCX (250) vs LBISX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. LBISX (3.25). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. LBISX (42.40).
| LBISX | RMFCX | LBISX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.91 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.694 | 14.779 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.20 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.25 | 8.11 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.78 | 43.61 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.40 | 59.28 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.80 | 93.90 | 40% |