Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBISX vs RMFCX
LBISX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBISX vs RMFCX
LBISX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBISX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBISX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LBISX (111M). LBISX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBISX (1.95) vs RMFCX (1.19). LBISX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBISX (16 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LBISX (0.85). LBISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBISX: RMFCX (250) vs LBISX (1000000). LBISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. RMFCX (10.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.58 vs. LBISX (14.66).
| LBISX | RMFCX | LBISX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.705 | 6.522 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 1.19 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.20 | 10.30 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.62 | 35.10 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.66 | 36.58 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.51 | 96.37 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement