Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBISX vs RMFCX
LBISX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBISX vs RMFCX
LBISX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBISX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBISX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBISX (113M). LBISX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBISX (1.92) vs RMFCX (1.16). LBISX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBISX (16 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LBISX (0.85). LBISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBISX: RMFCX (250) vs LBISX (1000000). LBISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.46 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. LBISX (18.95).
| LBISX | RMFCX | LBISX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.355 | 9.137 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.16 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.46 | 8.88 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.21 | 34.84 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.95 | 37.23 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.76 | 91.06 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement