Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMEBX
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMEBX
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LBSAX (48.1B). LBSAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBSAX (1.23) vs RMEBX (0.99). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBSAX (24 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LBSAX (0.90). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSAX (19.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMEBX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). LBSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.31 vs. RMEBX (4.65). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. RMEBX (34.68).
| LBSAX | RMEBX | LBSAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.565 | 8.448 | 149% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1B | 117B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.99 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.31 | 4.65 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.39 | 34.88 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.88 | 34.68 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.24 | 92.45 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers