Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFCX
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$34.22
Change+$0.26 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.09B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LBSAX (42.1B). LBSAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBSAX (1.46) vs RMFCX (1.31). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBSAX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (14.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. LBSAX (6.54). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.24 vs. RMFCX (51.66).
| LBSAX | RMFCX | LBSAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.383 | 5.919 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.1B | 105B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.31 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 9.01 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.10 | 17.82 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.24 | 51.66 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.88 | 70.47 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement