Ad is loading...
LBSAX vs RMFCX
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$34.51
Change-$0.33 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.16B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.23
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LBSAX (43.2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LBSAX (1.51). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LBSAX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.03 vs. LBSAX (10.10). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.58 vs. RMFCX (41.75).
| LBSAX | RMFCX | LBSAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.671 | 4.836 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.2B | 105B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.69 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.10 | 11.03 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.06 | 19.69 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.58 | 41.75 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.91 | 64.83 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...