Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFCX
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$35.12
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.49B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.27 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.29B
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. LBSAX (43.5B). LBSAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBSAX (1.43) vs RMFCX (1.27). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBSAX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (14.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.02 vs. LBSAX (9.72). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 69.34 vs. RMFCX (61.41).
| LBSAX | RMFCX | LBSAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.183 | 9.394 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 108B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.27 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.72 | 11.02 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.48 | 29.32 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.34 | 61.41 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.63 | 78.04 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement