Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
LBSAX vs RMFCX
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$35.23
Change-$0.14 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.23
Change-$0.50 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LBSAX (42.7B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LBSAX (1.51). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (22 years). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LBSAX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFCX (21.31) and LBSAX (20.68) have marching annual gain over last year. LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.58 vs. RMFCX (44.92).
| LBSAX | RMFCX | LBSAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.315 | 16.440 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 104B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.69 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.68 | 21.31 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.48 | 15.46 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.58 | 44.92 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.26 | 65.01 | 139% |