Ad is loading...
LBSAX vs RMFCX
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$32.82
Change-$0.79 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.22
Change-$1.42 (-2.55%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.7B vs. LBSAX (42.2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LBSAX (1.51). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LBSAX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). LBSAX (13.02) and RMFCX (12.63) have marching annual gain over last year. LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.58 vs. RMFCX (40.39).
| LBSAX | RMFCX | LBSAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.348 | 11.423 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2B | 98.7B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.69 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.02 | 12.63 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.39 | 14.16 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.58 | 40.39 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.92 | 61.84 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...