Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFCX
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$36.54
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LBSAX (45B). LBSAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBSAX (1.38) vs RMFCX (1.24). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBSAX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (16.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. LBSAX (7.19). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.65 vs. RMFCX (60.44).
| LBSAX | RMFCX | LBSAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.461 | 13.116 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45B | 111B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.24 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | 7.56 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.82 | 33.69 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.65 | 60.44 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.64 | 96.24 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement