Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFCX
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$36.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.24B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBSAX (44.2B). LBSAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBSAX (1.42) vs RMFCX (1.26). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBSAX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (16.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFCX (6.98) and LBSAX (6.92) have marching annual gain over last year. LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.68 vs. RMFCX (54.21).
| LBSAX | RMFCX | LBSAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.208 | 11.642 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2B | 109B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.26 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 6.98 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.36 | 29.24 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.68 | 54.21 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.33 | 91.22 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement