Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFCX
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFCX
LBSAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBSAX (48.7B). LBSAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBSAX (1.24) vs RMFCX (1.15). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSAX (24 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBSAX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSAX (16.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). LBSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.49 vs. RMFCX (9.09). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.19 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| LBSAX | RMFCX | LBSAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.065 | 9.496 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7B | 118B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.49 | 9.09 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.06 | 33.16 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.19 | 37.08 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | 92.36 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers