Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFEX
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$35.09
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.26B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBSAX (43.3B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFEX (1.51) vs LBSAX (1.42). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (14.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.05 vs. LBSAX (9.69). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.16 vs. RMFEX (56.76).
| LBSAX | RMFEX | LBSAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.030 | 9.675 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.3B | 109B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.51 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.69 | 11.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.43 | 26.87 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.16 | 56.76 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.79 | 85.72 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement