Ad is loading...
LBSAX vs RMFEX
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$34.51
Change-$0.33 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.16B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.60
Change-$0.62 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LBSAX (43.2B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFEX (1.95) vs LBSAX (1.51). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSAX (22 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LBSAX (17.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.37 vs. LBSAX (10.10). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.58 vs. RMFEX (43.97).
| LBSAX | RMFEX | LBSAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.671 | 4.880 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.2B | 105B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.95 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.10 | 11.37 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.06 | 20.81 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.58 | 43.97 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.91 | 71.03 | 134% |