Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFEX
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$36.73
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.52B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.60
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LBSAX (45.5B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LBSAX (1.37). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (16.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.19 vs. LBSAX (7.29). LBSAX (64.09) and RMFEX (61.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSAX | RMFEX | LBSAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.783 | 15.248 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5B | 113B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.46 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.29 | 8.19 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.59 | 45.24 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.09 | 61.35 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.65 | 102.04 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement