Ad is loading...
LBSAX vs RMFEX
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$32.61
Change-$1.14 (-3.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$54.47
Change-$1.82 (-3.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LBSAX (42.1B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFEX (1.61) vs LBSAX (1.47). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSAX (22 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (14.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. LBSAX (5.79). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 89.03 vs. RMFEX (78.86).
| LBSAX | RMFEX | LBSAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.744 | 2.891 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.1B | 103B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.61 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | 7.10 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.36 | 12.51 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.03 | 78.86 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.08 | 70.99 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...