Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFEX
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$36.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.24B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.97
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBSAX (44.2B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFEX (1.51) vs LBSAX (1.42). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (16.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. LBSAX (6.92). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.68 vs. RMFEX (56.62).
| LBSAX | RMFEX | LBSAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.208 | 11.858 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2B | 109B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.51 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 7.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.36 | 30.46 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.68 | 56.62 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.33 | 98.75 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement