Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFEX
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$34.22
Change+$0.26 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.09B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LBSAX (42.1B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFEX (1.58) vs LBSAX (1.46). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (14.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. LBSAX (6.54). LBSAX (56.24) and RMFEX (54.01) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSAX | RMFEX | LBSAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.383 | 6.053 | 56% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.1B | 105B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.58 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 9.37 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.10 | 18.90 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.24 | 54.01 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.88 | 77.06 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement