Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFEX
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$35.12
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.49B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.71
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.29B
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. LBSAX (43.5B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFEX (1.53) vs LBSAX (1.43). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (14.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.36 vs. LBSAX (9.72). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 69.34 vs. RMFEX (63.91).
| LBSAX | RMFEX | LBSAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.183 | 9.546 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 108B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.53 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.72 | 11.36 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.48 | 30.54 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.34 | 63.91 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.63 | 84.99 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement