Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFEX
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFEX
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LBSAX (48.1B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFEX (1.41) vs LBSAX (1.23). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSAX (24 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LBSAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSAX (19.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). LBSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.31 vs. RMFEX (5.11). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. RMFEX (37.76).
| LBSAX | RMFEX | LBSAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.565 | 8.776 | 143% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1B | 117B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.41 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.31 | 5.11 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.39 | 36.71 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.88 | 37.76 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.24 | 102.44 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers