Ad is loading...
LBSCX vs RMEBX
LBSCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$30.70
Change+$0.45 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.21B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LBSCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LBSCX (39.2B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMEBX (1.18) vs LBSCX (0.77). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBSCX (22 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. LBSCX (-1.19). LBSCX (53.75) and RMEBX (52.21) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMEBX | LBSCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.07 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.07 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.515 | -2.724 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 95.8B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.18 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.19 | 1.74 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.71 | 5.82 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.75 | 52.21 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.19 | 53.41 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...