Ad is loading...
LBSCX vs RMEBX
LBSCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$32.45
Change-$0.42 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.65B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.07
Change-$0.84 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.15B
LBSCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LBSCX (42.7B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMEBX (1.15) vs LBSCX (0.78). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBSCX (22 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. LBSCX (6.85). LBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.76 vs. RMEBX (52.38).
| LBSCX | RMEBX | LBSCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.07 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.07 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.560 | 3.661 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 104B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.15 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 8.24 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.37 | 18.60 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.76 | 52.38 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.15 | 67.56 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...