Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMEBX
LBSCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$34.60
Change-$0.13 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.7B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
LBSCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBSCX (44.7B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMEBX (1.09) vs LBSCX (0.73). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (16.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. LBSCX (6.23). LBSCX (57.07) and RMEBX (55.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMEBX | LBSCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.07 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.07 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.456 | 11.179 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.7B | 109B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.09 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.23 | 7.45 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.66 | 31.44 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.07 | 55.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.32 | 89.18 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement