Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMEBX
LBSCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMEBX
LBSCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBSCX (48.7B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMEBX (1.00) vs LBSCX (0.60). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBSCX (24 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSCX (16.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). LBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. RMEBX (8.96). LBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.07 vs. RMEBX (36.13).
| LBSCX | RMEBX | LBSCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.07 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.07 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.575 | 9.416 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7B | 118B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.00 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 8.96 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.48 | 32.63 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.07 | 36.13 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.73 | 90.64 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement