Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$34.25
Change+$0.10 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.97B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.07B
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBSCX (44B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.27) vs LBSCX (0.76). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. LBSCX (8.35). LBSCX (61.37) and RMFCX (60.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.032 | 11.347 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44B | 110B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.27 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 11.38 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.39 | 30.87 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.37 | 60.49 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.09 | 81.82 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement