Ad is loading...
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$32.64
Change+$0.19 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.57B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LBSCX (42.6B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LBSCX (0.87). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LBSCX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). LBSCX (12.91) and RMFCX (12.43) have marching annual gain over last year. LBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.39 vs. RMFCX (37.82).
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.836 | 2.162 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6B | 103B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.69 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.91 | 12.43 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.86 | 12.60 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.39 | 37.82 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.15 | 65.18 | 135% |