Ad is loading...
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$31.60
Change-$0.76 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.22
Change-$1.42 (-2.55%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.7B vs. LBSCX (42.2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LBSCX (0.87). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LBSCX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFCX (12.63) and LBSCX (12.02) have marching annual gain over last year. LBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.69 vs. RMFCX (40.39).
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.367 | 11.423 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2B | 98.7B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.69 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.02 | 12.63 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.46 | 14.16 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.69 | 40.39 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.23 | 61.84 | 136% |