Ad is loading...
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$31.82
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.97B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LBSCX (41B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.37) vs LBSCX (0.80). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. LBSCX (3.27). LBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.29 vs. RMFCX (56.16).
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.188 | 1.270 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 101B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.37 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.27 | 5.35 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.75 | 17.29 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.29 | 56.16 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.94 | 60.33 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...