Ad is loading...
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$30.70
Change+$0.45 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.21B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LBSCX (39.2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.34) vs LBSCX (0.77). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. LBSCX (-1.19). LBSCX (53.75) and RMFCX (53.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.515 | -2.681 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 95.8B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.34 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.19 | 1.87 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.71 | 6.27 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.75 | 53.32 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.19 | 54.78 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...