Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$32.64
Change-$0.07 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LBSCX (42.2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LBSCX (0.77). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. LBSCX (5.88). LBSCX (51.00) and RMFCX (50.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.250 | 5.423 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2B | 105B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.31 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | 8.44 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.59 | 18.47 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.00 | 50.95 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.05 | 69.73 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers