Ad is loading...
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$33.18
Change-$0.32 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.16B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.23
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LBSCX (43.2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LBSCX (0.87). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LBSCX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.03 vs. LBSCX (9.12). LBSCX (42.72) and RMFCX (41.75) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.537 | 4.836 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.2B | 105B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.69 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | 11.03 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.93 | 19.69 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 41.75 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.09 | 64.83 | 133% |