Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$33.93
Change-$0.14 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.23
Change-$0.50 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LBSCX (42.7B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LBSCX (0.87). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (22 years) vs RMFCX (22 years). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LBSCX (17.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.31 vs. LBSCX (19.65). LBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.92 vs. RMFCX (44.92).
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.539 | 16.440 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 104B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.69 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.65 | 21.31 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.61 | 15.46 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.92 | 44.92 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.99 | 65.01 | 126% |