Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBSCX (48.7B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.16) vs LBSCX (0.60). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (24 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSCX (16.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). LBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. RMFCX (9.09). LBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.07 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.575 | 9.496 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7B | 118B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.16 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 9.09 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.48 | 33.16 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.07 | 37.08 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.73 | 92.36 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers