Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFEX
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$34.60
Change-$0.13 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.53B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBSCX (44.5B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFEX (1.49) vs LBSCX (0.73). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (16.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.06 vs. LBSCX (6.23). RMFEX (58.84) and LBSCX (57.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFEX | LBSCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.456 | 11.638 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.5B | 109B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.49 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.23 | 8.06 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.66 | 33.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.07 | 58.84 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.32 | 98.59 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement