Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFEX
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$35.41
Change+$0.28 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.05B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.40
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LBSCX (45.1B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LBSCX (0.72). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (16.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.87 vs. LBSCX (3.50). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.57 vs. LBSCX (59.21).
| LBSCX | RMFEX | LBSCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.334 | 14.880 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.1B | 111B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.46 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 5.87 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.91 | 40.73 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.21 | 63.57 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.15 | 96.37 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement