Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFEX
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$34.35
Change-$0.05 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.17B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.61
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.95B
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBSCX (44.2B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFEX (1.51) vs LBSCX (0.75). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. LBSCX (8.29). RMFEX (57.73) and LBSCX (56.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFEX | LBSCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.823 | 11.197 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2B | 110B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.51 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 9.41 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | 24.51 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.23 | 57.73 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.49 | 86.15 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement