Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFEX
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$32.64
Change-$0.07 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.70
Change-$0.05 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LBSCX (42.2B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFEX (1.58) vs LBSCX (0.77). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. LBSCX (5.88). RMFEX (53.30) and LBSCX (51.00) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFEX | LBSCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.250 | 5.559 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2B | 105B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.58 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | 8.80 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.59 | 19.58 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.00 | 53.30 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.05 | 76.28 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement