Ad is loading...
LBSCX vs RMFEX
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$30.70
Change+$0.45 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.21B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.29
Change+$0.77 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LBSCX (39.2B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFEX (1.61) vs LBSCX (0.77). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSCX (22 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. LBSCX (-1.19). RMFEX (55.72) and LBSCX (53.75) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFEX | LBSCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.515 | -2.593 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 95.8B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.61 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.19 | 2.21 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.71 | 7.26 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.75 | 55.72 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.19 | 60.75 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...