Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFEX
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFEX
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBSCX (48.7B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFEX (1.42) vs LBSCX (0.60). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSCX (24 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LBSCX (16.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). LBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. RMFEX (9.45). RMFEX (39.25) and LBSCX (39.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFEX | LBSCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.575 | 9.694 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7B | 118B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.42 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 9.45 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.48 | 34.42 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.07 | 39.25 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.73 | 100.56 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers