Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMEBX
LBWAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$22.28
Change-$0.11 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.32M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.23
Change-$0.34 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.58B
LBWAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LBWAX (97.3M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBWAX (1.34) vs RMEBX (1.05). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.47 vs. LBWAX (1.68). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 56.87 vs. LBWAX (38.94).
| LBWAX | RMEBX | LBWAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.894 | 14.224 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.3M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.05 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 6.47 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.18 | 43.08 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.94 | 56.87 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.45 | 91.28 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement