Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMEBX
LBWAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$22.45
Change+$0.10 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.94M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.56
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LBWAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LBWAX (96.9M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBWAX (1.36) vs RMEBX (1.09). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. LBWAX (3.58). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.30 vs. LBWAX (42.40).
| LBWAX | RMEBX | LBWAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.694 | 12.994 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.9M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.09 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.58 | 7.43 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.00 | 33.12 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.40 | 59.30 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.02 | 94.40 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement