Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMEBX
LBWAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMEBX
LBWAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBWAX (117M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBWAX (1.25) vs RMEBX (0.99). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWAX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LBWAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). LBWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. LBWAX (18.62).
| LBWAX | RMEBX | LBWAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.07 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.227 | 9.416 | 172% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.99 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 8.96 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.66 | 32.63 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.62 | 36.13 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.48 | 90.64 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers