Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMFCX
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$21.45
Change+$0.18 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.08M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.62
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBWAX (93.1M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWAX (1.42) vs RMFCX (1.26). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. LBWAX (4.47). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.97 vs. LBWAX (36.42).
| LBWAX | RMFCX | LBWAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.196 | 9.891 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.1M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.26 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 9.82 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.47 | 25.99 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | 54.97 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.85 | 78.66 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement