Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMFCX
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$22.45
Change+$0.10 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.94M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LBWAX (96.9M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWAX (1.36) vs RMFCX (1.24). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. LBWAX (3.58). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.44 vs. LBWAX (42.40).
| LBWAX | RMFCX | LBWAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.694 | 13.116 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.9M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.58 | 7.56 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.00 | 33.69 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.40 | 60.44 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.02 | 96.24 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement