Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMFCX
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$22.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.93M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBWAX (92.9M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWAX (1.36) vs RMFCX (1.21). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. LBWAX (-2.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.85 vs. LBWAX (33.10).
| LBWAX | RMFCX | LBWAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.894 | 12.617 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.9M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.21 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.09 | 5.59 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.84 | 27.75 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.10 | 51.85 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.83 | 84.46 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers