Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMFCX
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMFCX
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. LBWAX (109M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWAX (1.31) vs RMFCX (1.19). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWAX (16 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBWAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). LBWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.54 vs. RMFCX (10.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. LBWAX (6.38).
| LBWAX | RMFCX | LBWAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.458 | 5.845 | 162% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.54 | 10.10 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.34 | 34.65 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.38 | 33.85 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.41 | 91.46 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers