Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMFCX
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMFCX
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBWAX (122M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWAX (1.25) vs RMFCX (1.15). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWAX (16 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBWAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). LBWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.56 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. LBWAX (20.97).
| LBWAX | RMFCX | LBWAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.779 | 10.454 | 189% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 122M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.15 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.56 | 9.14 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.21 | 38.82 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.97 | 36.70 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.60 | 92.27 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers