Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RWEBX
LBWAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$22.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.93M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.54
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
LBWAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. LBWAX (92.9M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBWAX (1.36) vs RWEBX (0.76). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.20 vs. LBWAX (-2.09). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. LBWAX (33.10).
| LBWAX | RWEBX | LBWAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.06 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.06 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.894 | 7.797 | 153% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.9M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.76 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.09 | 3.20 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.84 | 26.70 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.10 | 39.61 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.83 | 66.23 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement