Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RWEBX
LBWAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$22.28
Change-$0.11 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.32M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.73
Change-$0.31 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.11B
LBWAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LBWAX (97.3M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBWAX (1.34) vs RWEBX (0.76). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.44 vs. LBWAX (1.68). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. LBWAX (38.94).
| LBWAX | RWEBX | LBWAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.06 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.06 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.894 | 9.754 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.3M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.76 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 4.44 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.18 | 43.65 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.94 | 47.15 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.45 | 75.80 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement