Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RWEBX
LBWAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RWEBX
LBWAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. LBWAX (109M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBWAX (1.31) vs RWEBX (0.75). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWAX (16 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). LBWAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). LBWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.54 vs. RWEBX (7.24). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.77 vs. LBWAX (6.38).
| LBWAX | RWEBX | LBWAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.06 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.06 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.458 | 5.239 | 181% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 214B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.75 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.54 | 7.24 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.34 | 29.98 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.38 | 22.77 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.41 | 78.62 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement