Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RWMHX
LBWAX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RWMHX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$22.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.93M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$65.89
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
LBWAX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. LBWAX (92.9M). LBWAX (1.36) and RWMHX (1.33) have matching dividends . LBWAX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RWMHX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.91 vs. LBWAX (-2.09). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 43.18 vs. LBWAX (33.10).
| LBWAX | RWMHX | LBWAX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.41 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.41 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.894 | 8.429 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.9M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.33 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.09 | 3.91 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.84 | 29.08 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.10 | 43.18 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.83 | 71.17 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement