Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RWMHX
LBWAX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RWMHX
LBWAX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RWMHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LBWAX (120M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LBWAX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LBWAX (1.22). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBWAX (16 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). LBWAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMHX (32.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RWMHX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). LBWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. RWMHX (1.96). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 26.83 vs. LBWAX (20.77).
| LBWAX | RWMHX | LBWAX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.41 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.41 | 302% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.387 | 4.436 | 415% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.33 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 1.96 | 585% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.36 | 29.79 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.77 | 26.83 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.93 | 81.23 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers