Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RWMHX
LBWAX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RWMHX
LBWAX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RWMHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LBWAX (111M). RWMHX (1.32) and LBWAX (1.31) have matching dividends . LBWAX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBWAX (16 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). LBWAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RWMHX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). LBWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.73 vs. RWMHX (8.01). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 26.99 vs. LBWAX (12.43).
| LBWAX | RWMHX | LBWAX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.41 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.41 | 302% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.474 | 1.555 | 738% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.32 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.73 | 8.01 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.00 | 30.13 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.43 | 26.99 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.60 | 81.70 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement