Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMEBX
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.11
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.93M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.27
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBWCX (92.9M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LBWCX (0.66). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. LBWCX (-2.87). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.76 vs. LBWCX (27.91).
| LBWCX | RMEBX | LBWCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.07 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.156 | 12.462 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.9M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.05 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.87 | 5.45 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.09 | 27.22 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.91 | 50.76 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.62 | 82.68 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement