Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMEBX
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.75
Change-$0.15 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.24M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.42
Change-$0.42 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.69B
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBWCX (97.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMEBX (1.11) vs LBWCX (0.69). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. LBWCX (2.48). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.20 vs. LBWCX (35.18).
| LBWCX | RMEBX | LBWCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.07 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.550 | 10.648 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.2M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.11 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | 6.08 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | 27.18 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.18 | 53.20 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.83 | 86.56 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement