Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMEBX
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMEBX
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBWCX (117M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMEBX (0.99) vs LBWCX (0.71). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWCX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LBWCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). LBWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.30 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. LBWCX (13.95).
| LBWCX | RMEBX | LBWCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.07 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.751 | 9.416 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.99 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.30 | 8.96 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.34 | 32.63 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.95 | 36.13 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.01 | 90.64 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers