Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMEBX
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMEBX
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBWCX (113M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMEBX (1.00) vs LBWCX (0.73). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWCX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LBWCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). LBWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.89 vs. RMEBX (8.70). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.43 vs. LBWCX (8.02).
| LBWCX | RMEBX | LBWCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.07 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.369 | 9.399 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.89 | 8.70 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.51 | 35.78 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.02 | 36.43 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.27 | 90.72 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement