Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFCX
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.75
Change-$0.15 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.24M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.10
Change-$0.42 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.69B
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBWCX (97.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFCX (1.26) vs LBWCX (0.69). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. LBWCX (2.48). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.32 vs. LBWCX (35.18).
| LBWCX | RMFCX | LBWCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.550 | 10.776 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.2M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.26 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | 6.23 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | 27.72 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.18 | 54.32 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.83 | 88.26 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement