Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFCX
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.24M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBWCX (93.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFCX (1.21) vs LBWCX (0.66). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LBWCX (-1.83). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. LBWCX (29.08).
| LBWCX | RMFCX | LBWCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.610 | 12.783 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.2M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.21 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.83 | 6.00 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.54 | 27.94 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.08 | 52.67 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.12 | 84.73 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement