Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFCX
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.10
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.67M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LBWCX (97.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LBWCX (0.65). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. LBWCX (2.04). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. LBWCX (34.28).
| LBWCX | RMFCX | LBWCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.762 | 14.779 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.20 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 8.11 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.12 | 43.61 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.28 | 59.28 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.70 | 93.90 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement