Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFCX
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFCX
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBWCX (117M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LBWCX (0.71). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWCX (16 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBWCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). LBWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.30 vs. RMFCX (9.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. LBWCX (13.95).
| LBWCX | RMFCX | LBWCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.751 | 9.496 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.15 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.30 | 9.09 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.34 | 33.16 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.95 | 37.08 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.01 | 92.36 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement