Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFEX
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.75
Change-$0.15 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.24M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.49
Change-$0.42 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.69B
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBWCX (97.2M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFEX (1.51) vs LBWCX (0.69). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.56 vs. LBWCX (2.48). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 56.71 vs. LBWCX (35.18).
| LBWCX | RMFEX | LBWCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.62 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.550 | 10.977 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.2M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.51 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | 6.56 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | 28.91 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.18 | 56.71 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.83 | 95.66 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement