Ad is loading...
LBWCX vs RMFEX
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$20.72
Change-$0.26 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.64M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.60
Change-$0.62 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LBWCX (214M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFEX (1.95) vs LBWCX (0.39). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWCX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (25.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.37 vs. LBWCX (8.11). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.97 vs. LBWCX (13.96).
| LBWCX | RMFEX | LBWCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.594 | 4.880 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.95 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 11.37 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.79 | 20.81 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.96 | 43.97 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.71 | 71.03 | 16% |