Ad is loading...
LBWCX vs RMFEX
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$18.27
Change-$0.18 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.61M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.89
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. LBWCX (80.6M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFEX (1.61) vs LBWCX (0.71). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.93 vs. LBWCX (-9.19). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.69 vs. LBWCX (25.52).
| LBWCX | RMFEX | LBWCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.62 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.865 | -7.620 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.6M | 92.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.61 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.19 | -3.93 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.53 | 0.28 | -3,086% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.52 | 47.69 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.44 | 51.93 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...