Ad is loading...
LBWCX vs RMFEX
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$19.84
Change+$0.26 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.06
Change+$0.56 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. LBWCX (206M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFEX (1.95) vs LBWCX (0.39). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWCX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (25.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.46 vs. LBWCX (8.52). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.98 vs. LBWCX (7.82).
| LBWCX | RMFEX | LBWCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.764 | 10.279 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.95 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 11.46 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.36 | 13.43 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.82 | 39.98 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.07 | 65.36 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...