Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFEX
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFEX
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBWCX (113M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFEX (1.42) vs LBWCX (0.73). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWCX (16 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LBWCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). LBWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.89 vs. RMFEX (9.18). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.55 vs. LBWCX (8.02).
| LBWCX | RMFEX | LBWCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.369 | 9.643 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.42 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.89 | 9.18 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.51 | 37.63 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.02 | 39.55 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.27 | 100.63 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement