Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RMFCX
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$21.15
Change-$0.21 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.39M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.96
Change-$0.50 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.7B
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBWIX (92.4M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWIX (1.63) vs RMFCX (1.26). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBWIX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. LBWIX (1.53). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.18 vs. LBWIX (40.88).
| LBWIX | RMFCX | LBWIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.640 | 8.675 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.4M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.26 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | 6.95 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.83 | 25.63 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.88 | 56.18 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.04 | 76.53 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers