Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RMFCX
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$22.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.24M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBWIX (93.2M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWIX (1.56) vs RMFCX (1.21). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBWIX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LBWIX (-0.70). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. LBWIX (36.33).
| LBWIX | RMFCX | LBWIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.631 | 12.783 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.2M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.21 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.70 | 6.00 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.35 | 27.94 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.33 | 52.67 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.82 | 84.73 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers