Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RMFCX
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$22.29
Change+$0.33 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.78M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.52
Change+$0.57 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.68B
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBWIX (95.8M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWIX (1.63) vs RMFCX (1.26). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBWIX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.93 vs. LBWIX (3.41). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.19 vs. LBWIX (42.25).
| LBWIX | RMFCX | LBWIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.636 | 11.550 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.8M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.26 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.41 | 7.93 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.99 | 27.07 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.25 | 57.19 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.43 | 99.97 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement