Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RMFCX
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$22.52
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.67M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LBWIX (97.7M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWIX (1.55) vs RMFCX (1.20). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBWIX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. LBWIX (3.18). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. LBWIX (41.76).
| LBWIX | RMFCX | LBWIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.631 | 14.779 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.20 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.18 | 8.11 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.42 | 43.61 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.76 | 59.28 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.74 | 93.90 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement