Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RMFCX
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RMFCX
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LBWIX (115M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWIX (1.37) vs RMFCX (1.16). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWIX (16 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBWIX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). LBWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. RMFCX (7.99). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.58 vs. LBWIX (19.29).
| LBWIX | RMFCX | LBWIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.120 | 8.300 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.16 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.25 | 7.99 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.81 | 31.34 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.29 | 36.58 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.08 | 89.18 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement