Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RWMHX
LBWIX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RWMHX
LBWIX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RWMHX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. LBWIX (115M). LBWIX (1.37) and RWMHX (1.35) have matching dividends . LBWIX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBWIX (16 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). LBWIX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RWMHX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). LBWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. RWMHX (5.38). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 27.47 vs. LBWIX (19.29).
| LBWIX | RWMHX | LBWIX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.41 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.41 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.120 | 3.553 | 426% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.35 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.25 | 5.38 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.81 | 26.81 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.29 | 27.47 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.08 | 75.12 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement