Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBDX vs RMEBX
LCBDX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCBDX vs RMEBX
LCBDX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBDX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBDX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LCBDX (369M). LCBDX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LCBDX (3.13) vs RMEBX (1.04). LCBDX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LCBDX (13 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and LCBDX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . LCBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCBDX: RMEBX (250) vs LCBDX (1000000). LCBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. RMEBX (10.26). LCBDX return over 5 years is better than : 62.36 vs. RMEBX (37.34).
| LCBDX | RMEBX | LCBDX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.572 | 6.614 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 369M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 1.04 | 302% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.28 | 10.26 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.78 | 29.20 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.36 | 37.34 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.62 | 91.84 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers