Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBDX vs RMFCX
LCBDX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCBDX vs RMFCX
LCBDX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBDX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBDX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LCBDX (363M). LCBDX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LCBDX (3.07) vs RMFCX (1.15). LCBDX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCBDX (13 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LCBDX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LCBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCBDX: RMFCX (250) vs LCBDX (1000000). LCBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.06 vs. RMFCX (4.75). LCBDX return over 5 years is better than : 57.19 vs. RMFCX (35.61).
| LCBDX | RMFCX | LCBDX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.236 | 8.539 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 363M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 1.15 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 4.75 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.01 | 35.38 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.19 | 35.61 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.44 | 94.16 | 149% |