Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBEX vs RWMEX
LCBEX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts LCBEX vs RWMEX
LCBEX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBEX vs. RWMEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBEX is a StrongBuy and RWMEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LCBEX (9.31B). LCBEX pays higher dividends than RWMEX: LCBEX (1.27) vs RWMEX (1.15). LCBEX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: LCBEX (13 years) vs RWMEX (24 years). LCBEX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.61). RWMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LCBEX (30.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCBEX: RWMEX (250) vs LCBEX (1000000). RWMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.71 vs. LCBEX (-0.99). RWMEX return over 5 years is better than : 25.61 vs. LCBEX (9.83).
| LCBEX | RWMEX | LCBEX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.61 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.61 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.529 | 4.265 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.31B | 218B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.99 | 1.71 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.16 | 28.86 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.83 | 25.61 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.29 | 79.11 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement