Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBEX vs RWMFX
LCBEX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LCBEX vs RWMFX
LCBEX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBEX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBEX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LCBEX (9.31B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than LCBEX: RWMFX (1.41) vs LCBEX (1.27). LCBEX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LCBEX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). LCBEX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LCBEX (30.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCBEX: RWMFX (250) vs LCBEX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. LCBEX (-0.99). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. LCBEX (9.83).
| LCBEX | RWMFX | LCBEX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.529 | 4.508 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.31B | 218B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.41 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.99 | 2.09 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.16 | 30.24 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.83 | 27.39 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.29 | 82.36 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers